The March 6 issue of the Economist highlighted the problem of gendercide – the “disappearance” of an estimated 100 million baby girls, either killed, aborted or neglected. Three factors were cited:
• the traditional preference for sons
• a modern desire for smaller families (including China’s one-child policy)
• technologies that identify the sex of a foetus (such as ultrasound scanning)
Distorted sex ratios are unbalancing societies in many parts of the world. In China and northern India for example, for children born in the early 2000s, the imbalance has risen to 120 boys to 100 girls born. Similar tendencies can be found in other East Asian countries, including Taiwan and Singapore, and in former communist states in the western Balkans and the Caucasus. Wealth does not seem to be a factor; within China and India the areas with the worst ratios are the richest, best-educated ones.
When these children reach maturity, a shortage of brides will be evident. China for example will have as many unmarried young men as the entire population of young men in America. In many countries, rootless young males are associated with higher crime rates, bride trafficking and sexual violence. A study in China shows that higher sex ratios accounted for about one-seventh of the rise in crime.
Only South Korea has managed to reverse its cultural preference for sons. Female education, anti-discrimination suits and equal-rights rulings made “son preference” seem old-fashioned and unnecessary. Concerned countries should therefore promote actions that raise the value of girls through the encouragement of female education, the engagement of women in public life and the abolishment of laws and customs that prevent daughters inheriting property.
Is gender preference an issue in your country? What actions could IFUW together with its NFAs and other NGOs take to help protect baby girls in the regions concerned?
Click here to read and write comments.
Much attention is given to the gender pay gap, but one hears much less about the increasing gender pension gap – a growing problem in most countries.
Pension systems are usually based on employment related contributions. Women’s working patterns – long career breaks because of child rearing, part-time work , lower salaries and lower retirement ages – all result in reduced pension benefits. Many women rely upon their partners for retirement income, but this is not always a secure option. Coupled with their longer life expectancy, these factors are forcing older women into the poorest demographic groups in many nations.
One solution would be for women to increase optional contributions to pension schemes, but during the economic downturn, fewer women can afford to save, especially those with dependent children.
Some developed countries try to compensate for these differences through systems providing a universal minimum pension and credits for child rearing years. A few have even established pension schemes based on residence instead of employment or family work.
What is the situation in your country? How can the gender pension gap be addressed? Most young women do not think about the later impact of “lost” working years, lower salaries and part-time hours. How do you think women can build a financially secure future?
Click here to read and write comments.
The traditional family model, with men supporting the family and women caring for the household, is no longer realistic. Women today most often share the role of provider with men. Yet, men have not taken on an equivalent share of responsibility for domestic tasks. In Mexico, for example, in families where both partners have paid jobs, men spend 52 hours a week on paid work and 12.5 hours on domestic chores, while women spend 37 hours at work and 38.5 hours on domestic chores.
A recent report by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), “Work and Family: Towards new forms of reconciliation with social co-responsibility”, suggests that reconciliation between work and family has to happen through social co-responsibility: “redistributing care responsibilities between men and women, as well as among the family, the State, the market and society as a whole”.
The report proposes measures ranging from alternating the time between work and family life (paternity leave, flexible working hours and work place), shifting tasks originally performed in the family sphere into the market and public services, and redistributing roles between women and men by fostering cultural change during primary education and within the family.
What is the situation in your country? Which measures, if any, are be used to encourage a work/family balance?
Source: “Work and Family: Towards new forms of reconciliation with social co-responsibility” (Decent work in Latin America and the Caribbean)
Click here to read and write comments.
Recent Comments